Ranks peacefulness rather than democracy itself.
Who participates, who represents, and who checks power?
Start with corruption and accountability, then expand to elections, representation, public spending and local government.
Three rankings, three different questions.
CurioLens keeps rank, total countries, score and methodology together so a ranking is not read without context.
Shows the environment in which journalists and news organisations can work.
Compares perceived public-sector corruption across countries.
Institutional quality changes slowly.
Worldwide Governance Indicators use an estimate scale rather than a simple global rank. They are shown separately so unlike measures are not mixed.
Can people participate, speak freely and hold government accountable?
World Bank WGI ↗How effectively is public power kept from private misuse?
World Bank WGI ↗How strong are public services and policy implementation?
World Bank WGI ↗How much confidence is there in rules, courts and contract enforcement?
World Bank WGI ↗How does India compare on corruption perception?
Score is 0–100; higher is cleaner. Rank is shown separately because score is better for tracking change over time.
Participation, accountability and clean institutions
A democracy dashboard should combine elections, voice, institutional quality, media freedom, peace and corruption indicators — while keeping each methodology separate.
A ranking is not a complete verdict
Global Peace, Press Freedom and CPI measure different things. CurioLens shows them together for context but never combines them into a single “democracy score”.